Joseph Javier Perla

The site design looks much more balanced when this sentence is long

How to Ace an IQ Test

7 comments

I was researching intelligence quotient and IQ tests on Wikipedia. I stumbled upon, as one always does on Wikipedia, an interesting kind of IQ test: Raven’s Progressive Matrices.

It had a link at the bottom to an iq test: http://www.iqtest.dk/main.swf. It’s pretty interesting. I recommend you check it out. You know how I feel about IQ tests. So, I decided to figure out how it works. It’s actually pretty simple. I think that anyone smart can follow my simple tricks and figure out how to get a perfect score pretty easily and well under the time limit of 40 minutes.

It took me a little longer than twice as long as the test to figure out and document the general patterns as well as verify all of the answers.

Raven’s Progressive Matrices

The puzzle is very simple, and does not even require much explanation. It simply shows you a 3×3 (or 2×2) matrix of black-and-white symbols. The lower right corner is not filled in, but the rest are. You are supposed to deduce the pattern and figure out what should most logically fill the lower right corner.

For example:

\ | /
{ | }
( | ?

What would go in the “?” spot? Good, a “)”. That’s a pretty simple pattern. They get much more complicated, but they still are all based on just a few basic rules. Please note that I made up all these terms. You don’t know which kind of matrix a given matrix is, but you can figure it out pretty quickly.

Rules

Momentum

Look at problem 2 on the iqtest.dk site. That’s momentum. If the first symbol and the next symbol look the same, except for one little thing moves or changes or adds to itself, and then it moves or changes or adds to itself by the same amount on the next symbol, then that’s momentum. Just follow that.

Example:

( (( (((
_ __ ___
{ {{ ?

The answer: {{{.

Note that this rule can become less obvious if there is what I call “carry”. That is, if the symbol itself is a little 3×3 matrix, and you “move” to the right, then some of the elements will fall out of the little matrix, so then you must “carry” them over to the next row of the litle matrix.

Set Completion

Look at problem 8 on iqtest.dk. That is simple set completion. Think of each symbol having a number of properties: size, color, shape, etc. If you can’t sem to follow a progression like you can in Momentum, but it just looks like a bunch of random, but somewhat related things with similar properties, then the problem can be set completion.

I can best show you this in an example (use your imagination about the shapes):

^ O []
O [] ^
[] ^ ?

Answer: O

You need to complete the set of shapes on the last row. Notice that the last column also needs to complete the set of shapes (the diagonal too in this case, but that’s not always the case).

A common property of set-completion that makes this kind of problem much easier, is to look at the triangles made. Notice:


^ x x
x x ^
x ^ x

and


x x []
x [] x
[] x x

and


x O x
O x x
x x ?

.

Obviously, the ? should be an O. Set-completion is simple, if the first row has a red, white, and blue, and the second has one red, one white, and one blue, make sure the third has one of each.

This can get more complicated because you can have multiple properties, shapes and colors etc, all compounded on each other. But, if you just find the triangle, this problem is simple.

Composition

If one symbol looks like the other two put together, then it is just composition. You just have to figure out in what way it should be put together. Maybe the rule is, always put it on the inside of the first. Maybe it’s, always put it on the outside. Whatever it is, this one is usually pretty easy. I won’t even give an example. Question 30 uses composition.

Subtraction

Subtraction is much like composition, look for one thing looks like the other two put together, but with a twist. The subtraction could be complete, just one shape minus the other. Or it could be XOR (exclusive-or). You take two symbols, and take out the lines which are in one, but not the other.

Example:

_|_| | __|
|__| |_| |_|
__| |__ ?

Answer: | |

Functions

If the first symbol in a row looks like the last symbol, but the middle symbol looks weird or especially if it’s a line or arrows or something simple, then that middle symbol might be a “function.” By function I mean something that geometrically transforms the first symbol into the third symbol. The function is not necessarily intuitive, but usually makes sense in terms of what the function symbol looks like.

In the same example I used above, the vertical bar “|” is a function that reflects the first symbol horizontally over itself, like a mirror.

\ | /
{ | }
( | ?

What’s interesting is that you can apply one function to another function. So, you might apply a rotation function with a flipping function, flipping the rotation function, creating a function that both rotates and flips. Pretty cool.

Replacement

Replacement is where they trick you. The rule might be very simple, but it becomes very hard to figure out quickly, because the elements inside the symbol change for arbitrary reasons simultaneously. Question 25 is an example of movement with replacement together.

Commonality

Finally, if all the symbols look randomly chosen with a bunch of properties and possible configurations, then start to look for commonalities. Don’t look for a 1.2.3. pattern like movement, just look for rules that each symbol has in common. For example, say that each black element should be on top of a white element in exactly one symbol in each row.

This can be difficult, but is easier if you know that it’s none of the other rules, and you are looking for a commonality, not a progression of patterns. Once you have some rules, start ruling out answers until you find a final answer. Question 26 is an example.

Putting it all together

Skeptical that the answers are so easily based on the rules above? They really are. What makes the difference between an easy and a hard problem is that a hard problem will use multiple rules together. Fortunately, using multiple rules together usually doesn’t make it much harder to figure out as long as you systematically think through these possibilities. If you are having trouble with a problem, you should stop, take a deep breath, look back at the matrix as a whole, and then think through each of these rules and rule them out or use them as appropriate. All matrices follow one or more of these rules.

On the iqtest.dk site, the lowest score you can get is “below 79″. The highest you can get is “above 145.” The answers to all of the questions I put below, along with an explanation referencing the rules used to get the answers:

D Come on (momentum?)
F Momentum
B Momentum
G Set completion (angle of line)
A Momentum (size and column)
H Momentum
B Momentum (notice that the squares hide each other)
E Set completion
H Set completion / Momentum ?
A Subtraction
C Application of function (enlargement along axis)
F Set-completion (angle and number lines)
B Momentum
D Subtraction
H Subtraction
E Composition and set-completion with replacement
F Momentum (one example has carry)
C Subtraction
E Momentum with carry
D Set-completion (angle and number black/white)
G Momentum
A Oppositing? (a bit like subtraction but from sets of attributes of platonic ideal)
B Set-completion (1. small ball color, 2. big outside shape, 3. inside v. outside)
H Set-completion (1. flat bottom, 2. widening, 3. partially-closed top)
B Non-repetition? Set-completion? (Movement and replacement?)
A Commonality (180 deg rotational symmetry and middle pegs always covered)
H Subtraction
G Set-completion
E Function-application (and function-application on other functions!)
A Composition
D Subtraction yields line which is a function you apply which is reflection and delete line
E Movement
G Set-completion?
G Valuation (attach negative integer for ball inside circle, positive outside) then add
C Function application (with a bit of spatial reasoning)
F Set-completion (big-stack color, two-stack color, bar-chart position)
H Movement and replacement based on progression (replace as hidden by dark square)
F Function application (functions on functions)
B Movement with carry and replacement

So

I think I will write a program that creates Raven Progressive Matrices dynamically. I think that would be really cool, and probably useful for some psychologists.

I just discovered that Dr. Raven has a website with links to papers describing the inner workings of the Matrices: http://www.johnraven.co.uk/pubs/pubs.html . I guess that might have made my job a little easier.

[?]

Written by Joseph Perla

August 26th, 2007 at 7:42 pm

Posted in School

7 Responses to 'How to Ace an IQ Test'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. Joseph,
    Please please explain to me number 26. It’s strange, I understand every single one of them EXCEPT for number 26 and it’s supposed to get increasingly more difficult. There’s just something I’m not getting about question 26 and it’s driving me nuts…

    Pop

    30 Dec 07 at 11:06 pm

  2. This one isn’t so obvious. It’s because there is some overlapping in the diagram. Matrices with overlapping are harder because you lose information, but you don’t know it.

    Here’s how you should approach the problem, since there is no obvious movement or set-completion. Look for commonalities. What is common to all of the images? Study it carefully. You’ll start to notice that a line goes through all three of the middle pegs. You’ll also notice that it kind of looks like there is one big line (with length 2) going through the center peg, and two smaller lines (with length 1) which start at middle pegs on the edges next to the center peg in nearly every image. If you look more carefully, these three middle pegs are bolder than the others, confirming that there is something special about them.

    Study the big length-2 line going through the center. What does it seem to do from left to right? From top to bottom? Yes, it seems to rotate 45 degrees clockwise each step from left to right, and rotate 45 degrees counter-clockwise for each stem from top to bottom. An interesting pattern. It can even help you eliminate your choices down to A, D, and E.

    Study commonalities. All of the images have rotational symmetry. Even if you did not notice the lines, you should have noticed that. That would have narrowed down the answers to A, B, C, E, and G. More importantly, it would give you an insight into the nature of the puzzle.

    Now, looking more at rotations, you see that plainly the whole image is not rotating from image to image. But, you start to see sub-rotations. The big-line in the center rotates in sequence. Maybe the little ones too? Look at the second row. They seem to. The little line on the left rotates 45 degrees clockwise at every step, while the little line on the right rotates 45 degrees counter-clockwise. It’s easy to see if you imagine removing the big line which is rotating clockwise 45 degrees every step.

    You test out your theory on everything and see that it works (So what is the answer?). You also see why the puzzle is difficult. The image in the top left has the big line and both smaller lines intersecting in the middle. You lose a lot of information about the smaller lines. Moreover, it’s the first image you look at, forming the first image in the first two sequences you investigate.

    That’s one reason I disagree with this matrix as a measure of intelligence. Yes, it takes reasoning to look past this first example, but how long? It’s a timed test. If one day, your eye happens to glance at the second row first, you will probably get the answer more quickly. Another day, you may want to rigorously start at the first sequence left-right compared to the second top-down. It will take wildly different amounts of time to solve it based on random factors depending on when you have the epiphany. Other matrices are flawed in different ways.

    You might say, well, then you must learn to look at all the different patterns immediately. Maybe. But with the time pressure of just half an hour and a few dozen examples, that’s seems an unnecessary meta-burden to prove intelligence. Of course, taking multiple such kinds of test, you will learn that. Unfortunately, psychologists don’t want you to take the test multiple times. I’ve been conversing with a psychologist who has done years of research on them. He says that the scores definitely go up as people get used to the tests, as more people in the world become familiar with the test over time. These people are not becoming “more intelligent.” That’s strong evidence that these tests are farces.

    me

    31 Dec 07 at 9:20 am

  3. There is a movement pattern in question 26.

    Look at the second pattern (middle of top row). Each of the three dots in the middle row is the centre of a rotation pattern. The answer is A, as indicated by Joseph, but this is a simpler solution.

    The one I struggle with is 20. It seems that H is an equally plausible answer as D.

    As for these tests being a farce, I agree. I can score 140+ on most IQ tests, but I’m not any smarter than most other people. It is just a matter of practice.

    BR

    1 Jan 08 at 12:46 pm

  4. BR, our solutions are the same. However, just saying how to get the answer to this question isn’t much better than simply telling Pop the answer. It is much more valuable to analyze how to approach this problem and similar classes of problems. It is much more interesting and fun to break down how the problem is constructed, to understand why the problem is hard.

    On 20, I’m sorry but I’m having trouble seeing how H is as plausible as D. There are a number of isomorphic ways to look at this matrix. Here is one:

    The pattern is set-completion. Each row/column must have one each of those three patterns of spaced black petals.

    Now, take the three patterns that you see which have the two black petals juxtaposed and one black petal opposite those two. Imagine merging all these black petals onto one flower. Notice how the whole flower is black. Each one of the 9 black petals on the three patterns we are considering is in a different position, none overlap, none are in the same relative position on the flower.

    Now, consider the three patterns with the black petals equally spaced out around the flower, the patterns on the rising diagonal. Notice that putting those black petals together also creates a black flower.

    Doing the same thing for the last three illustrates that it only D makes sense. H or E would overlap petals, leaving white spaces after merging.

    Of course, you can look at it another way. Set-completion, by rotating each pattern 120 degrees. This doesn’t quite work for the rising diagonal, indicating this isn’t a complete picture. Nevertheless, this also points to D.

    Joseph Perla

    1 Jan 08 at 1:33 pm

  5. I merely point out that there is a movement pattern in 26. This one is no more or less a measure of intelligence than many of the others. That one must look past the first block or two is just another wrinkle.

    As for 20, you are right. It is a set completion question and D is correct. I got stuck by rotating 120 degrees, which, as you point out, doesn’t lead to a clear answer.

    BR

    6 Jan 08 at 10:06 am

  6. Hey,
    It seems they’ve updated the IQ test page. Your answers are no longer valid and for several of the questions the “functions” are no longer valid as well. For kicks I punched in your answers and got “Less than 74″.

    Personally I would love an update since I am strugling with several of them and have no idea where I am screwing up.

    Help Help

    STDK

    STDK

    5 Oct 08 at 2:19 pm

  7. Oopss .. Seems I solved the Danish version (Dansk). The english version is diffrent.

    STDK

    STDK

    5 Oct 08 at 2:22 pm

Leave a Reply